Solar Farm DEIR Comments Due Thursday!  

The comment deadline for the E-Group solar plant is January 22, 2026. That is this Thursday! Please if you haven’t already, write a short letter to the City of Twentynine Palms stating why the DEIR (Draft Environmental Impact Report) is deficient and whether the project should be more carefully assessed or stopped now. The DEIR paints a picture of what’s to come if we do not slow down or stop the project as it is currently unfolding. We potentially have a perfect (dust) storm on our hands because the project involves (apologies):

Here are the steps to take:

  1. Download the DEIR from the City Website portal found here
  2. Read the DEIR or skim it to the best of your ability. The document is supposed to be accessible to you under CEQA. If you have difficulty downloading it or find it difficult to navigate or read, TELL THE CITY. Ask them for help. You can also find a copy of the DEIR at the library as well.
  3. Submit your comments to:

Email: Keith Gardner, the Community Development Director of Twentynine Palms at:  kgardner@29palms.org

Mail / hand-delivery:
Keith Gardner, Community Development Director
City of Twentynine Palms
6136 Adobe Road
Twentynine Palms, CA 92277

Here are some key takeaways from the DEIR:

MASS GRADING – The project would involve leveling the varied topograpy. This would involve moving over half a million cubic yards of soil to a wavy-NOT FLAT-landscape). This is a controversial and uncommon practice in the solar industry. Generally flat sites are selected for solar farms.

SOIL THAT IS PARTICULARY SUSCEPTIBLE TO EROSION – The site is situated on unconsolidated alluvial sediments. This is a recipe for erosion.

A WINDY SETTING – we all know how windy Twentynine Palms is. The city is downwind from the solar farm and any dust storms would head in the direction of the main populated areas of the city.

PROXIMITY TO NEIGHBORS AND COMMUNITY SPACES WITHIN CITY LIMITS (neighbors lie just 1400 feet away. Two mile road and Highway 62 are within easy walking distance. The 29 Palms cemetery is only about 2000 feet away. Stater Brothers and commercial corridor are right down the street from there.  

Add this up, and we can begin to see what the effects of this project on our community would be. But add to that: The E-Group solar plant is proposed to be located inside occupied desert tortoise habitat where a healthy population of tortoises now lives. PLUS, this particular desert tortoise just happens to be part of a crucial wildlife corridor linking the marine base and JTNP. Wildlife needs this corridor. Much of it has already been developed or is threatened by other projects (including the Ofland Resort project.) The last thing the desert tortoise—and other wildlife in our region needs is a huge industrial solar power plant with mass grading of pristine desert soil.  

CHECK OUT THE DEIR AND SEND IN YOUR COMMENTS BY JANUARY 22.

TELL A FRIEND! The q

SCROLL DOWN TO THE NEXT BLOG POST FOR LETTER SAMPLES THAT YOU CAN CUT® EDIT ® PASTE ® SEND

Solar Plant Approval Under AB205: A Very Rare Event

Location of proposed E-Group Solar Plant

Reasons are mounting that circumventing the city under State Assembly Bill 205 would not give E-Group’s solar plant an easy path to approval. In addition to doubts that the plant could generate enough electricity to qualify and pass environmental review, there is now this: AB 205 has almost never been used! Therefore, the Twentynine Palms community has free choice to act in our own best interest and just say “No” to E-Group’s proposal.

City officials should be extra careful to avoid spreading inaccurate information. Our officials must help citizens understand that: (1) E-Group’s solar power plant would not necessarily be approved under AB 205 for numerous reasons, and (2) in the event that it did grant approval, the State process would afford our community enforceable compensation and protection.

How many solar farms have been approved under AB 205 to date? The answer is: One. And it was approved only a few weeks ago, on June 11, 2025 (2025, State of California). Why is this a big deal? It is a big deal because E-Group announced its intention to build the plant in a letter framed as an ultimatum:

“In the event that the City elects to maintain its current moratorium and not work with E- Group, E-Group will pursue approvals through the permitting process recently established through Assembly Bill 205, which is intended to facilitate the approval of renewable energy projects by the State without any local approval. If approved by the State, the City will have far less control over project design and conditions of approval and would receive substantially less in public benefits. While this is not E-Group’s preferred outcome, it is willing to vigorously pursue this route if needed.” (City of Twentynine Palms, 2023)  

At the time of the letter, zero power plants had been approved under AB 205. It appears that AB 205 is not a glide path to solar plant approval as E-Group had implied. Not only is approval as rare as hen’s teeth, but the only power plant that has been approved bears little resemblance to E-Group’s.

Here are a few of the differences between the one project that did garner approval under AB 205 and the project that our City has been asked to permit:

  • Difference Number One: The permitted plant is a huge 1,150-megawatt (MW) solar facility that will make an enormous impact on California’s overall solar energy capacity (State of California, 2025). Our community’s project would be much smaller at 50 MW (City of Twentynine Palms, 2024). Thus, our plant’s contribution to the state’s energy needs would be a drop in the bucket.
  • Difference Number Two: The approved project is to be built on previously disrupted soil that is no longer able to support agricultural production. E-Group proposes bulldozing our pristine desert soil, removing the precious desert crust that keeps soil in place. The land would be denuded of ancient creosote bushes, and its documented Desert Tortoise population would be threatened.
  • Difference Number Three: The AB 205 approved project has crafted concrete and extensive community and economic benefits that have been agreed to by diverse stakeholders. For example, the developer is bound to contribute: $2 million in Community investments over the next decade starting with a $320,000 commitment to Centro La Familia Advocacy Services, a nonprofit supporting crime victims, family wellness, and civic engagement in rural communities (State of California, 2025). By contrast, E-group has committed to a modest annual payment of between 100 and 150 thousand dollars to the City Council, who would decide how the money is spent. E-Group has thus not provided any guarantees to citizens that the funds would be used in ways they want.
  • Difference Number Four: The approved plant will be designed, owned, and operated by Intersect Power and its subsidiary Darden I LLC. These are both large American companies with deep experience in solar power development and operations in California, the greater United States, and globally. They have an extensive internet presence, a great reputation, many awards and certifications, many employees, and clear contact channels. See https://www.intersectpower.com/who-we-are/ Compare the Intersect Power organization to the little-known, tiny Slovakian company E-Group with its nearly invisible web presence. E-Group is apparently mainly a financial company with expertise in funding portions of renewable energy plants but no in-house resources dedicated to actually building and operating entire plants. They have never completed a project in California or in the United States.

Let us not be afraid that E-Group’s questionable project will be foisted on our City if we don’t want it. We are free to choose—together—what is best for our community.  

References

  1. State of California. (2025, June 12). CEC Approves World’s Largest Solar + Battery Storage in Fresno County Under Accelerated Permitting Program. California Energy Commission. https://www.energy.ca.gov/news/2025-06/cec-approves-worlds-largest-solar-battery-storage-project-fresno-county-under
  2. City of Twentynine Palms. (2023, May 23). Staff Report. Retrieved from https://citwentynine-palmsca.civicweb.net/document/31666/
  3. City of Twentynine Palms. (2024, February). Notice of Preparation and Initial Study. (https://www.ci.twentynine-palms.ca.us/vertical/sites/%7BAE145833-008D-4FBA-AEC7-7D0EBD90E334%7D/uploads/Revised_29_Palms_Solar_IS-NOP_2.20.241.pdf